Boost Savings, Now

The alarm bells should start ringing any time now. An important component of the economy has been sinking and needs to be rescued urgently. This critical piece is “savings” and within this overall head, household savings is the one critical sub-component that needs close watching and nurturing.

While it is true that one of the primary reasons behind the current economic slowdown is the tardy rate of capital expansion – or, investment in infrastructure as well as plant and machinery -- all attempts to stimulate investment activity are likely to come to a nought if savings do not grow.  Without any growth in the savings rate, it is futile to think of any spurt in investment and, consequently, in the overall economic growth. If we source all the investment funding from overseas, it might be plausible to contemplate investment growth without any corresponding rise in savings rate. But, that is unlikely to happen.

Within the overall savings universe, the sub-component “household savings” is most critical. It provides the bulk of the savings in the economy with private corporate savings and government saving contributing the balance. The worrying factor is the near-stagnation in household savings over the past 8 years or so. What’s even more disconcerting is the fact that household savings remained almost standstill during the go-go years of 2004-08.

This seems to be counter-factual.  There are many studies that show that there is a direct relationship between overall economic growth and household savings. Therefore, at a time when India’s GDP was growing by over 9% every year, the household savings rate stayed almost constant at close to 23% of GDP. There was, of course, an increase in absolute terms, but it remained somewhat fixed as a proportion of the GDP.  

*As percentage of GDP at current market prices

What is responsible for this contradictory movement? The sub-group on household savings, formed by the working group on savings for the twelfth plan set up by the Planning Commission and chaired by RBI deputy governor Subir Gokarn, has this to say: “...a recent study...had attributed the decline in the household saving ratio in the United Kingdom during 1995 to 2007 to a host of factors such as declining real interest rates, looser credit conditions, increase in asset prices and greater macroeconomic stability...While recognizing that one of the key differences in the evolving household saving scenario between the United Kingdom and India is the impact of demographics (dependency ratio), anecdotal evidence on increasing consumerism and the entrenchment of (urban) lifestyles in India, apart from the easier availability of credit and improvement in overall macroeconomic conditions is perhaps indicative of some ‘drag’ on household saving over the past few years as well as going forward.”

India has another additional facet: a penchant for physical assets (such as bullion or land). Post the monsoon failure of 2009, and the attendant rise in price levels which has now become somewhat deeply entrenched, Indians have been stocking up on gold. Consequently, savings in financial instruments dropped while those in physical assets shot up. This is also disquieting for policy planners because savings in physical assets stay locked in and are unavailable to the economy for investment activity.

There is a counter view which says that higher economic growth does not necessarily lead to higher savings. According to a paper published by Ramesh Jangili (Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, Summer 2011), while economic growth doesn’t inevitably lead to higher savings, the reciprocal causality does hold true. “It is empirically evident that the direction of causality is from saving and investment to economic growth collectively as well as individually and there is no causality from economic growth to saving and (or) investment.”

Whichever camp you belong to, it is beyond any doubt that savings growth is a necessary pre-condition for promoting economic growth. The Planning Commission estimates that an investment of $1 trillion or over Rs 50 lakh crore will be required for the infrastructure sector alone. And, a large part of this critical investment will have to be made from domestic savings.

With savings -- particularly household savings – currently languishing, preliminary forms of the crisis is already showing up across different places. For instance, the lack of incremental addition to the savings reservoir is resulting in a liquidity crisis of sorts, thereby constraining the central bank’s actions. With deposit growth trailing credit growth, Reserve Bank has been forced to focus its efforts on ensuring adequate liquidity in the system. Hence, the repeated cuts in reserve requirements over the past few months.

The government has one Budget before it sets out for the 2014 general elections.  Reserve Bank has two shots before that -- its mid-quarter review on December 18 and the third quarter sometime in end-January, early February. Some solutions will be required to make households save more.

Traditionally, tax breaks were used to lure in savers. With the precarious state of the fiscal, policy experts will have to find innovative ways to provide tax breaks without jeopardising the fine balance. Second, inflation has to brought under control to wean households away from physical assets. Finally, ways must be found to ensure that some legacy savings sources – such as pension, insurance -- become more attuned to investor needs. Today, the real return from these sources is negative or just marginally positive.

Published as an Op-Ed in The Economic Times (December 13, 2012)

Football Politics

It was 1980 and a sultry Calcutta, August 16, afternoon. Tensions were running high in the city: the cops had marshalled their forces and the lumpen armies had sharpened their arsenals. Two bitter rivals were facing off  -- East Bengal versus Mohun Bagan, bringing the summer of the Calcutta football season to a crescendo. Like thousands of fans, I too trudged a dusty path to the verdant Eden Gardens, hoping to catch a classic derby from the concrete bleachers.

Hope brings prayers to the lips; but loyalty, a sense of belonging to a cause or a club can dredge up the ancient tribal instincts. And violence is what emerges from the churn. At the end of the game, 16 dead bodies were laid down next to each other, club affiliations be damned. Hundred others were bludgeoned and bloodied, but fortunate to have escaped the mindless soccer savagery.

But, what really topped the absurdity scales that day was the match result: Mohun Bagan-0 -- East Bengal-0. It was one of the worst displays of football I've ever seen. Poor skills, pathetic gamesmanship, appalling strategy. And, yet it provided so much conviction to fans that they ended up killing 16 and injuring hundreds of others.

That day was eventful for other reasons. I, for one, stopped watching Indian football from that day. I have never ever watched a Mohun Bagan-East Bengal match after that dreadful day; not on telly, leave alone the thought of going to the stadium. Skipped the parts about them in the local newspapers too. Sometimes, and these are rare occasions, I feel I have been a bit too harsh on my adolescent and youthful pre-occupations. Not worth it, my left side would shout out any such rising doubts.

But, as with family traits, the lessons of 1980 seem to have got scattered and weakened with the passage of time. A fresh resurgence of violence broke out again during a Mohun Bagan vs East Bengal game yesterday (read here and here). It's the same story. Reprise 1980 with one thankful omission: nobody died.

I have often wondered what could fan such passions? How can people still brave the elements and watch such dreary stuff? Improving satellite connections have weaned me off. Whenever I've tried to watch a similar derby on the box, I've immediately switched channels. The local stuff seems to be playing out in excruciating slow-mo, compared with the outstanding quality of European and Latin American soccer now available at the press of a button!

Which brings the mind back to mindless violence. I have often thought about that fateful August day of 1980 and inevitably concluded that the violence was the outcome of a new voice, a new sense of  empowerment sanctioned to a new section of lumpens co-opted by the then new ruling party. Cut to 2012 and the violence seems to be the handiwork of a new set of lumpens, patronised by a new political party. According to unconfirmed reports, the police have recovered a large and shocking cache of arms from fans (read here).

Who says it's just a game!