The Ordinance Gambit: Strategy Or Tactic?

All in all, Congress must be licking its chops for seemingly executing a neat political strategy. But there could be some deleterious collateral damage lurking in the shadows. It now turns out Manmohan Singh will have to become the fall guy for having persisted with an ordinance that allowed elected legislators with criminal convictions to continue in Parliament.

For those who tuned in late, the Cabinet passed an ordinance on September 24, 2013, called Representation of the People (Amendment and Validation) Bill, 2013. The ordinance sought to negate a Supreme Court ruling of July 10, which said that legislators would be disqualified immediately if convicted by a court for a sentence of two years or more. The immediate concern for rushing ahead with an ordinance – instead of waiting for Parliament to reconvene – was apparently the imminent sentencing of RJD chief Lalu Prasad Yadav (an important ally for Congress ) and Congress politician Rasheed Masood. The BJP – which was ambivalent initially –  weighed its assets against its criminal liabilities and figured opposing the ordinance made more sense.

Then as suddenly as the ordinance was sprung on an unsuspecting public, Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi parachuted into a press conference being addressed by Ajay Maken and announced his displeasure with the ordinance. He called the ordinance “a complete nonsense” and suggested that it be “torn and thrown away!” There was a collective gasp from across the country because this comment was made when the prime Minister was in USA. As soon as he returned, in a show of amazing alacrity, the same Cabinet withdrew the ordinance on October 2. (for a complete chronology of events, read here)

Manmohan Singh & Rahul Gandhi in happier times. Pix courtesy of AFP

What does all this indicate? Here are a few stray thoughts and my take on the entire episode:

* This was a deliberate ploy. It was planned and executed to make Rahul Gandhi come out smelling like roses. The casualty will be the Cabinet members, who are all older than the young party vice-prez. The upshot, as Congress poll managers would want it to appear: the geriatric Cabinet wanted to protect status quo but the vigilant youth forced the change.  This hypothesis seems credible because one suddenly noticed Congress party lightweights, considered to be members of RG’s charmed circle, openly tweeting against the ordinance even before the dramatic press conference (read it here). It seems unlikely that, under normal circumstances, they would have had the gumption to openly criticise an ordinance cleared by the Cabinet. Unless of course they had instructions from somebody senior in the party.

* The party went ahead with the ordinance in the belief that all parties would support it. But, with elections so near, BJP stole some of the television thunder by publicly venting their ire against the ordinance. They even met the President to express their disappointment with the proposed legislation. Public mood seemed to be turning against the ordinance; there were rumblings within other political parties too. Civil society was agitated. Sensing that the mood was turning, Congress must have decided to turn the liability into a show of virtue.

The collateral damage could be Manmohan Singh who comes out of this episode looking rather sheepish and servile. He also emerges as a political relic, charging down the road with a legislation that favoured a venal brand of politics. He is also likely to be branded – subtly of course – as the man who was responsible for wrecking the economy and somebody who now must make way for the impatient and ambitious youth.  This is unfortunate and undeserved for MMS – it's like a bum ride into the sunset for somebody who went through public life with his probity and value system intact.

But there could be one proverbial fly in the ointment – the deliberate slight to Manmohan Singh still raises issues about dynastic politics. This may not go down well with young voters and, as sure as the sun rises from the east, the Opposition isn’t likely to let this opportunity slip away. In the end, it will be interesting to see who and what influences the young finger on the button.

Petrol On Fire

In all fairness, the government shouldn't be blamed for policy paralysis. They have acted with such alacrity. Petrol prices were hiked by Rs 7.5 per litre as soon as Parliament went into recess. So, no shouting brigades, no loud thumping of desks, no rushing into the well of the House, no hectoring or haranguing, and no "pliss-pliss". Good only, no?

Actually, the petrol price increase raises two other issues. One, we can expect to finally see the extent of the increase pared down by Rs 2-3 per litre. The protests from allies has already started acquiring a high decibel level. By Wednesday evening, both Mamata Banerjee and Karunanidhi had voiced their displeasure over the increase. SP's Mulayam Singh Yadav, who is being courted assiduously by Congress as a counter-weight to Didi, also expressed his opposition to the price hike. Ditto for RJD's Laloo Prasad Yadav. So, once all these protests reach a crescendo, and acquire some kind of a shrill heft, we might expect to see the Congress top brass relenting and "rolling back" the hike partially. My bet? By Rs 2-3 per litre.

Even The Economic Times is betting that the price rise might finally be tempered somewhat (read here), though for a different reason. Their take: oil prices in the Singapore bulk market have been cooling off a bit.

But, ironically, BJP and CPI(M) have been misleading the public from every forum. By the way, isn't it strange how the right and left get into bed conveniently when they want to squeeze out the centre? Their beef: petrol price hike has a cascading effect and is likely to have a spiralling impact on inflation. That's a load of nonsense. Here's why. Petrol has a negligible weightage (1.09%) in the wholesale price index and its ability, therefore, to bump up headline inflation remains marginal. Also, bulk goods movement --such as essential commodities -- are moved by modes of transport that use diesel as fuel (think trucks) and not petrol.

Are there any reasons to protest against the petrol price increase? Of course, shiploads of reasons to crib about the price rise, but certainly not on account of its impact on headline inflation. The current hike comes on top of the existing inflationary pressures weighing down the middle class. And, this current episode of high inflation and inflationary expectations has its roots in the survival strategy crafted by the government in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial freeze, but let it stay on for far too long. In short, this lifeline to the economy should have been withdrawn much earlier. Plus, of course, the government has been loath to either cut down on wasteful subsidies, or re-align its expenditure strategy which is actually ending up further fuelling inflation. And, let's not even get started on this business about governance deficit. So, of course there's plenty to cry about, but not because a petrol price increase will lead to inflationary pressures as the voices from the right and left are asserting.

The government should have increased prices of diesel along with petrol prices if it really wanted to bring down the current account deficit and stabilise the rupee value. A diesel price hike might certainly be seen as inflationary, but at least these high prices would've curbed demand for the commodity. In return, it might have squeezed the import bill a bit, checked the runaway current account deficit and pulled up the falling rupee.

It is well known that fuel prices needed to be increased, and even the Reserve Bank governor's statements have alluded to the fact about how domestic fuel prices lagging international prices does lead to a build-up of inflationary expectations.

But, guess why diesel prices cannot be increased immediately, though news reports suggest the government will be meeting tomorrow to consider the possibility? The answer: it's summer in this part of the world and, with kharif sowing to begin soon (in the next 30-45 days), pols can't afford to get farmers cross about high diesel prices. In many parts of the country, farmers will need to run their pumps at full tilt, even though we've been told to expect a normal monsoon.

If there was any reason to carp, the grouse should have been why the government didn't spend on improving irrigation infrastructure in the 60 years since Independence. And guess what MPs and MLAs are mostly concerned about? Getting a red beacon on their cars!